Reporte de la ONU condena a Israel por acciones en Gaza.

UN rebukes Israel over Gaza raids

The inquiry says Israel's use of white phosphorous was reckless in Gaza
A United Nations inquiry into attacks by Israeli forces on UN property during the Gaza conflict four months ago has heavily criticised Israel's army.

It found Israel to blame in six out of nine incidents when death and injuries were caused to people sheltering at UN property and UN buildings were damaged.

In one case, Palestinian militants were found to have fired at a UN warehouse.

The UN recommends further investigation into possible war crimes. Israel has branded the report "highly unbalanced".

The investigation rejects Israel's claim that militants were firing from the Fakhura school when at least 40 people outside the school were killed in shellfire.

The board of inquiry also criticises Israel's use of white phosphorous shells which caused the incineration of UN's main food warehouse in Gaza.

The Israeli foreign ministry said UN investigators had ignored evidence given by Israel and had sided with the Palestinian Hamas movement.

"The spirit of the report and its language are tendentious and entirely unbalanced and ignore the facts as they were presented to the commission," it said in a statement.

"The commission prefers the positions of Hamas, a murderous terror organization, and by doing so misleads the world public."

'Untrue'

The BBC's Laura Trevelyan at the UN says it is a hard-hitting report which includes heavy criticism of the Israeli military's actions and subsequent explanations and justifications.

The UN board's first recommendation seeks "formal acknowledgment" by Israel that its public statements that Palestinians fired from a UN school and from within the UN's field office compound "were untrue and are regretted".

Another says the UN should take appropriate action to seek accountability and reparation for all deaths and injuries involving its personnel and property.

The report says Israel's actions were in breach of the agreement that UN premises and those sheltering within them should be immune from attack, something which cannot be set aside for military action.

The board says investigating the deaths of the 40 people killed outside the Fakhura school is outside its remit.

It recommends that this and allegations of war crimes committed in Gaza and southern Israel by Palestinian militants and Israel should be investigated by another inquiry.

The UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon has stressed this report is not a legal document

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/8034565.stm


Para los hispanoparlantes, en resumen, el reporte indica que efectivamente Israel utilizo indiscriminadamente el fosforo blanco, que el aparato militar israeli mintio al afirmar que fueron atacados desde posiciones dentro del edificio de la ONU, que atacaron civiles que estaban resguardados dentro del edificio.

Israel, al igual que hara mas que uno en este foro, denigra el reporte indicando que esa es la version de los enemigos de Israel, y que la suya es la unica valedera.
 
Cargando...

¡Los Foreros están posteando en estos temas!

¿Qué se esta discutiendo en Foro de Costa Rica?


¿Está a favor de la portación de armas para la defensa personal?

  • Sí, para garantizar la seguridad individual

  • No, para reducir el riesgo de incidentes violentos


Los resultados solo son visibles tras votar.

📑 Evite Multas y Sanciones: Ofrecemos servicios de presentación de declaraciones de IVA (D104), alquileres (D125) y la anual de renta (D101)

¿Las universidades públicas costarricenses son refugios de ideologías extremistas?

  • Sí, son una cueva de profesores parásitos

    Votos: 440 58,8%
  • No, son cunas del libre pensamiento

    Votos: 308 41,2%

¿Apoya la creación de una ley de eutanasia en Costa Rica?

  • Sí, por el derecho a una muerte digna

  • No, por el respeto absoluto a la vida


Los resultados solo son visibles tras votar.

TicosLand is now also available on Android and iOS

¡Tendencia!

¿Costa Rica debería promover abiertamente el turismo sexual?

  • Sí, podría dar un impulso económico

  • No, debido a las implicaciones morales y sociales negativas


Los resultados solo son visibles tras votar.

🚀 FACTURATica.com la #1 sin Mensualidades ni Anualidades. Inscripción gratis en Hacienda.

¿Estaría de acuerdo en la pena de muerte para crímenes graves y flagrantes?

  • Sí y también para la corrupción

  • No, por el riesgo de errores judiciales y la ética de la vida


Los resultados solo son visibles tras votar.

¡Caliente!

¿Debería Costa Rica legalizar la marihuana para uso recreativo?

  • Sí, por los beneficios económicos y de seguridad

  • No, debido a los potenciales riesgos para la salud y la sociedad


Los resultados solo son visibles tras votar.
Atrás
Arriba