Kony 2012

No vi el video pero me llamo la atención esto:
konia.jpg
 
Cargando...
No vi todo el video, porque después de 4 min no llegaron a nada, que mal me caen los videos que no van al grano, o mejor dicho me impacientan demasiado.

Espero que capturen a ese mae.
 
Sorry, pero parece más una campaña gringa para darle cara y razones a un nuevo objetivo (KONY o África???)...
Cuando será la ocupación???

Mucha vara...
Como ese mae hay millones en el mundo...

Cuántos cuento se escucha de la trata de niños en china??? De todo eso algo debe ser cierto... Y nadie anda diciendo que Don Wong es el anticristo come niños...

Me pregunto:
Serán diamantes????

:?:?:?:?:?:?

Porque de igual manera, sí la historia es real, con algo se patrocina el Mumm Ra...
 
j5JbQ.jpg

Ha asesinado, violado y raptado niños y adultos por dos décadas en África Central, pero según leí link Obama desde oct 2o11 envio tropas para ver ese asunto duh!!
 
No vi todo el video, porque después de 4 min no llegaron a nada, que mal me caen los videos que no van al grano, o mejor dicho me impacientan demasiado.

Espero que capturen a ese mae.


Esa es la vara, ud no esta hecho para durar 29 min frente a un solo video.. jeje.. pero el video en si es bueno.
 
Gay. Es una campaña para que gente tonta lo comparta con sus amigos idiotas de Facebook y le suelten dinero a una ONG que no sirve para nada.

konyisland.jpg
 
Última edición:
El 68% de la plata recaudada se dirige a filmación, salarios, viáticos:

Visible Children - KONY 2012 Criticism

Bueno el copy/paste queda mal pero la cuestión es que hay que usar la cabeza. El video es un producto "bien shineado", pero la ONG que lo produció es una estafa en el mejor de los casos y el tipo prácticamente dejó de ser relevante en el 2006.

I do not doubt for a second that those involved in KONY 2012 have great intentions, nor do I doubt for a second that Joseph Kony is a very evil man. But despite this, I’m strongly opposed to the KONY 2012 campaign.KONY 2012 is the product of a group called Invisible Children, a controversial activist group and not-for-profit. They’ve released 11 films, most with an accompanying bracelet colour (KONY 2012 is fittingly red), all of which focus on Joseph Kony. When we buy merch from them, when we link to their video, when we put up posters linking to their website, we support the organization. I don’t think that’s a good thing, and I’m notalone.Invisible Children has been condemned time and time again. As a registered not-for-profit, its finances are public. Last year, the organization spent $8,676,614. ************SPAM/BANNEAR************ 32% went to direct services (page 6), with much of the rest going to staff salaries, travel and transport, and film production. This is far from ideal for an issue which arguably needs action and aid, not awareness, and Charity Navigator rates their accountability 2/4 stars because they lack an external audit committee. But it goes way deeper than that.The group is in favour of direct military intervention, and their money supports the Ugandan government’s army and various other military forces. Here’s a photo of the founders of Invisible Children posing with weapons and personnel of the Sudan People’s Liberation Army. Both the Ugandan army and Sudan People’s Liberation Army are riddled with accusations of rape and looting, but Invisible Children defends them,arguing that the Ugandan army is “better equipped than that of any of the other affected countries”, although Kony is no longer active in Uganda and hasn’t been since 2006 by their own admission. These books each refer to the rape and sexual assault that are perennial issues with the UPDF, the military group Invisible Children is defending.Still, the bulk of Invisible Children’s spending isn’t on supporting African militias, but on awareness and filmmaking. Which can be great, except that Foreign Affairs has claimed that Invisible Children (among others) “manipulates facts for strategic purposes, exaggerating the scale of LRA abductions and murders and emphasizing the LRA’s use of innocent children as soldiers, and portraying Kony — a brutal man, to be sure — as uniquely awful, a Kurtz-like embodiment of evil.” He’s certainly evil, but exaggeration and manipulation to capture the public eye is unproductive, unprofessional and dishonest.As Chris Blattman, a political scientist at Yale, writes on the topic of IC’s programming, “There’s also something inherently misleading, naive, maybe even dangerous, about the idea of rescuing children or saving of Africa. […] It hints uncomfortably of the White Man’s Burden. Worse, sometimes it does more than hint. The savior attitude is pervasive in advocacy, and it inevitably shapes programming. Usually misconceived programming.”Still, Kony’s a bad guy, and he’s been around a while. Which is why the US has been involved in stopping him for years. U.S. Africa Command (AFRICOM) has sent multiple missions to capture or kill Kony over the years. And they’ve failed time and time again, each provoking a ferocious response and increased retaliative slaughter. The issue with taking out a man who uses a child army is that his bodyguards are children. Any effort to capture or kill him will almost certainly result in many children’s deaths, an impact that needs to be minimized as much as possible. Each attempt brings more retaliation. And yet Invisible Children supports military intervention. Kony has been involved in peace talks in the past, which have fallen through. But Invisible Children is now focusing on military intervention.Military intervention may or may not be the right idea, but people supporting KONY 2012 probably don’t realize they’re supporting the Ugandan military who are themselves raping and looting away. If people know this and still support Invisible Children because they feel it’s the best solution based on their knowledge and research, I have no issue with that. But I don’t think most people are in that position, and that’s a problem.Is awareness good? Yes. But these problems are highly complex, not one-dimensional and, frankly, aren’t of the nature that can be solved by postering, film-making and changing your Facebook profile picture, as hard as that is to swallow. Giving your money and public support to Invisible Children so they can spend it on supporting ill-advised violent intervention and movie #12 isn’t helping. Do I have a better answer? No, I don’t, but that doesn’t mean that you should support KONY 2012 just because it’s something. Something isn’t always better than nothing. Sometimes it’s worse.If you want to write to your Member of Parliament or your Senator or the President or the Prime Minister, by all means, go ahead. If you want to post about Joseph Kony’s crimes on Facebook, go ahead. But let’s keep it about Joseph Kony, not KONY 2012.~ Grant OystonGrant Oyston is a sociology and political science student at Acadia University in Nova Scotia, Canada.Please do not email me except to provide alternative causes, or with media requests, as I am no longer able to read emails (which I’m receiving at a pace too rapid to keep up with).
 
Última edición:

Últimas Noticias de Costa Rica

📑 Evite Multas y Sanciones: Ofrecemos servicios de presentación de declaraciones de IVA (D104), alquileres (D125) y la anual de renta (D101)

¿Está a favor de la portación de armas para la defensa personal?

  • Sí, para garantizar la seguridad individual

  • No, para reducir el riesgo de incidentes violentos


Los resultados solo son visibles tras votar.

TicosLand is now also available on Android and iOS

¿Las universidades públicas costarricenses son refugios de ideologías extremistas?

  • Sí, son una cueva de profesores parásitos

    Votos: 413 59,0%
  • No, son cunas del libre pensamiento

    Votos: 287 41,0%

¿Apoya la creación de una ley de eutanasia en Costa Rica?

  • Sí, por el derecho a una muerte digna

  • No, por el respeto absoluto a la vida


Los resultados solo son visibles tras votar.

En tendencia

¿Costa Rica debería promover abiertamente el turismo sexual?

  • Sí, podría dar un impulso económico

  • No, debido a las implicaciones morales y sociales negativas


Los resultados solo son visibles tras votar.

🚀 FACTURATica.com la #1 sin Mensualidades ni Anualidades. Inscripción gratis en Hacienda.

¿Estaría de acuerdo en la pena de muerte para crímenes graves y flagrantes?

  • Sí y también para la corrupción

  • No, por el riesgo de errores judiciales y la ética de la vida


Los resultados solo son visibles tras votar.

¿Debería Costa Rica legalizar la marihuana para uso recreativo?

  • Sí, por los beneficios económicos y de seguridad

  • No, debido a los potenciales riesgos para la salud y la sociedad


Los resultados solo son visibles tras votar.
Atrás
Arriba