Hoy debido al golpe de Estado en Honduras, se menciona que el ultimo golpe de Estado vivido en America Latina fue el del 2002 contra Venezuela y mencionan que el presidente Bush y la CIA tuvieron un papel importante.
Lean con atencion este excelente ejemplo de un comentario muy objetivo, ataca tanto a Chavez por el golpe del 92 como a Bush por el golpe del 2002. Es decir, dice las cosas como son, por ejemplo:
"President Obama, as he's done this past month with Iran, will have to take special care to convince the hemisphere, if not the world, that the reality is just the opposite. He called Sunday morning on "all political and social actors in Honduras to respect democratic norms, the rule of law and the tenets of the Inter-American Democratic Charter," insisting the crisis "must be resolved peacefully through dialogue free from any outside interference." It was a good start - as was the announcement by Obama's ambassador in Honduras later in the day that the U.S. will not recognize any government installed to replace to replace Zelaya. Chavez himself led an aborted military coup in 1992, before he was elected Venezuela's president in 1998. But Obama needs to remember how sorely the memory of a failed 2002 coup attempt against ChÁvez still lingers in Latin America - and how convinced the region remains (not without reason) that the Bush Administration backed it. As a result, Obama may find that while he'd like to be the voice of dialogue, Latin leaders of all political stripes are likely to exhort him to come down hard on what Zelaya called the "kidnapping" of a democratically elected President."
Tomado de la Revista Time.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/time/08599190760000
Lean con atencion este excelente ejemplo de un comentario muy objetivo, ataca tanto a Chavez por el golpe del 92 como a Bush por el golpe del 2002. Es decir, dice las cosas como son, por ejemplo:
"President Obama, as he's done this past month with Iran, will have to take special care to convince the hemisphere, if not the world, that the reality is just the opposite. He called Sunday morning on "all political and social actors in Honduras to respect democratic norms, the rule of law and the tenets of the Inter-American Democratic Charter," insisting the crisis "must be resolved peacefully through dialogue free from any outside interference." It was a good start - as was the announcement by Obama's ambassador in Honduras later in the day that the U.S. will not recognize any government installed to replace to replace Zelaya. Chavez himself led an aborted military coup in 1992, before he was elected Venezuela's president in 1998. But Obama needs to remember how sorely the memory of a failed 2002 coup attempt against ChÁvez still lingers in Latin America - and how convinced the region remains (not without reason) that the Bush Administration backed it. As a result, Obama may find that while he'd like to be the voice of dialogue, Latin leaders of all political stripes are likely to exhort him to come down hard on what Zelaya called the "kidnapping" of a democratically elected President."
Tomado de la Revista Time.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/time/08599190760000
